Trezor Model One vs MetaMask
vs
M
ConsenSys
MetaMask
4.2| Software Wallet (Browser Extension/Mobile App)
At a Glance
How each wallet scores across key dimensions. Each axis is rated out of 5.
Ratings & Specs
4.1
Overall Rating
4.2
4.2 / 5
Security Rating
3.8 / 5
Hardware
Wallet Type
Software Wallet (Browser Extension/Mobile App)
Supports Bitcoin, Ethereum, and thousands of ERC-20 tokens (does not support Solana, Cardano, XRP, or Monero).
Assets Supported
Ethereum (ETH), ERC-20 tokens, and various EVM-compatible networks including Binance Smart Chain (BSC), Polygon, Avalanche, Arbitrum, Optimism, and many more.
Highlighted cell = stronger result on that metric.
Key Security Features
Trezor Model One
- PIN protection with scrambled matrix
- BIP-39 Passphrase support for hidden wallets
- 100% Open-source hardware and firmware
- Physical two-button transaction verification
- Deterministic key generation (BIP-32/39/44)
MetaMask
- Seed phrase (recovery phrase) encryption and password protection.
- Transaction signing prompts for user confirmation.
- Hardware wallet integration (Ledger, Trezor) for enhanced key security.
- Optional automatic logout/lock features.
- Security warnings for suspicious website interactions.
Pros & Cons
Trezor Model One
Pros
- •Affordable entry-level price point
- •100% open-source firmware and hardware architecture
- •Over 10 years of proven real-world security track record
- •Seamless integration with Trezor Suite desktop and web app
- •Physical two-button confirmation prevents unauthorized transactions
Cons
- •Uses outdated Micro-USB connector instead of USB-C
- •No Secure Element chip (passphrase strongly required against physical attacks)
- •Missing native support for major blockchains like Solana, Cardano, and XRP
- •Scrambled on-screen PIN entry is less convenient than touchscreen models
- •Trezor Safe 3 offers vastly superior hardware for only $10 more
MetaMask
Pros
- •Dominant and widely supported wallet for the Ethereum and EVM ecosystem.
- •Seamless integration with thousands of dApps and DeFi platforms.
- •Easy switching between multiple EVM-compatible networks.
- •User-friendly interface for managing tokens and NFTs.
- •Supports hardware wallet integration (Ledger, Trezor) for enhanced security.
Cons
- •As a software wallet, it is inherently more susceptible to malware and phishing attacks than hardware wallets.
- •Limited native support for non-EVM blockchains (e.g., Bitcoin, Solana) without wrapping or bridging solutions.
- •Browser extension can be vulnerable if the host browser or computer is compromised.
- •Transaction fees (gas) can be complex for new users to understand and manage.
Related Comparisons
Explore how Trezor Model One and MetaMask compare against other top hardware and software wallets.