MetaMask vs Trust Wallet
ConsenSys
MetaMask
Binance
Trust Wallet
Our Take
Not financial adviceTrust Wallet earns our recommendation with its 4.1 overall rating and superior security rating of 4.1. It supports over 10 million assets across 100+ blockchains, including Bitcoin and Solana. Security features like Biometric authentication (FaceID/TouchID) and a real-time security scanner protect your assets. The built-in staking and token swapping capabilities make it a self-contained powerhouse. It is the most versatile option for managing a diverse cryptocurrency portfolio.
MetaMask is the premier choice for Ethereum power users, carrying a 4.2 overall rating. It excels at integrating with thousands of dApps and DeFi platforms across EVM-compatible networks like Polygon and Arbitrum. While its security rating sits at 3.8, it offers hardware wallet integration with Ledger and Trezor to secure your keys. Choose MetaMask if you focus on the Ethereum ecosystem and require seamless browser extension access for decentralized applications.
Security
Trust Wallet
Trust Wallet has a higher 4.1 security rating and features Biometric authentication.
Asset Support
Trust Wallet
Trust Wallet supports over 10 million assets across 100+ blockchains.
Price
Both software wallets are free to download and use.
Usability
MetaMask
MetaMask has a 4.2 overall rating and offers seamless dApp integration.
At a Glance
How each wallet scores across key dimensions. Each axis is rated out of 5.
Ratings & Specs
Highlighted cell = stronger result on that metric.
Key Security Features
MetaMask
- Seed phrase (recovery phrase) encryption and password protection.
- Transaction signing prompts for user confirmation.
- Hardware wallet integration (Ledger, Trezor) for enhanced key security.
- Optional automatic logout/lock features.
- Security warnings for suspicious website interactions.
Trust Wallet
- Local key storage (Non-custodial)
- Biometric authentication (FaceID/TouchID)
- PIN code protection
- Encrypted Cloud Backup options
- Real-time security scanner for risky transactions
Pros & Cons
MetaMask
Pros
- •Dominant and widely supported wallet for the Ethereum and EVM ecosystem.
- •Seamless integration with thousands of dApps and DeFi platforms.
- •Easy switching between multiple EVM-compatible networks.
- •User-friendly interface for managing tokens and NFTs.
- •Supports hardware wallet integration (Ledger, Trezor) for enhanced security.
Cons
- •As a software wallet, it is inherently more susceptible to malware and phishing attacks than hardware wallets.
- •Limited native support for non-EVM blockchains (e.g., Bitcoin, Solana) without wrapping or bridging solutions.
- •Browser extension can be vulnerable if the host browser or computer is compromised.
- •Transaction fees (gas) can be complex for new users to understand and manage.
Trust Wallet
Pros
- •Supports a massive range of over 10 million assets and 100+ blockchains
- •User-friendly interface ideal for both beginners and experienced traders
- •Built-in staking and token swapping capabilities
- •Seamless access to decentralized applications (dApps) via integrated browser or WalletConnect
- •Non-custodial architecture ensures users retain full control of their private keys
Cons
- •As a hot wallet, it is inherently less secure than cold storage hardware wallets
- •The in-app dApp browser is unavailable on the iOS version due to Apple guidelines
- •Customer support channels can be overwhelmed due to the massive user base
- •Limited advanced charting tools for professional trading within the app