Trezor Safe 5 vs MetaMask
vs
M
ConsenSys
MetaMask
4.2| Software Wallet (Browser Extension/Mobile App)
At a Glance
How each wallet scores across key dimensions. Each axis is rated out of 5.
Ratings & Specs
4.8
Overall Rating
4.2
4.9 / 5
Security Rating
3.8 / 5
Hardware
Wallet Type
Software Wallet (Browser Extension/Mobile App)
Over 8,000 coins and tokens across dozens of blockchains including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and Cardano.
Assets Supported
Ethereum (ETH), ERC-20 tokens, and various EVM-compatible networks including Binance Smart Chain (BSC), Polygon, Avalanche, Arbitrum, Optimism, and many more.
Highlighted cell = stronger result on that metric.
Key Security Features
Trezor Safe 5
- EAL6+ Certified Secure Element
- On-Device Color Touchscreen PIN Entry
- BIP-39 & Shamir Backup (SLIP39) Support
- Passphrase Protection for Hidden Wallets
- Open-Source Firmware Stack
MetaMask
- Seed phrase (recovery phrase) encryption and password protection.
- Transaction signing prompts for user confirmation.
- Hardware wallet integration (Ledger, Trezor) for enhanced key security.
- Optional automatic logout/lock features.
- Security warnings for suspicious website interactions.
Pros & Cons
Trezor Safe 5
Pros
- •EAL6+ certified Secure Element chip protects against physical tampering
- •Responsive color touchscreen with tactile haptic feedback
- •Native Shamir Backup (SLIP39) multi-share recovery
- •Open-source firmware with transparent security architecture
- •USB-C connectivity with full Trezor Suite desktop and Android support
Cons
- •No Bluetooth connectivity (requires USB cable connection)
- •iOS support is limited to view-only mode in Trezor Suite
MetaMask
Pros
- •Dominant and widely supported wallet for the Ethereum and EVM ecosystem.
- •Seamless integration with thousands of dApps and DeFi platforms.
- •Easy switching between multiple EVM-compatible networks.
- •User-friendly interface for managing tokens and NFTs.
- •Supports hardware wallet integration (Ledger, Trezor) for enhanced security.
Cons
- •As a software wallet, it is inherently more susceptible to malware and phishing attacks than hardware wallets.
- •Limited native support for non-EVM blockchains (e.g., Bitcoin, Solana) without wrapping or bridging solutions.
- •Browser extension can be vulnerable if the host browser or computer is compromised.
- •Transaction fees (gas) can be complex for new users to understand and manage.
Similar Wallets
Similar to Trezor Safe 5
Related Comparisons
Explore how Trezor Safe 5 and MetaMask compare against other top hardware and software wallets.